How Mental Systems Believe
نویسنده
چکیده
Is there a difference between believing and merely understanding an idea?Descartes thought so. He considered the acceptance and rejection of an idea to be alternative outcomes of an effortful assessment process that occurs subsequent to the automatic comprehension of that idea. This article examined Spinoza's alternative suggestion that (a) the acceptance of an idea is part of the automatic comprehension of that idea and (b) the rejection of an idea occurs subsequent to, and more effortfully than, its acceptance. In this view, the mental representation of abstract ideas is quite similar to the mental representation of physical objects: People believe in the ideas they comprehend, as quickly and automatically as they believe in the objects they see. Research in social and cognitive psychology suggests that Spinoza's model may be a more accurate account of human belief than is that of Descartes.
منابع مشابه
How Effectiveness Of Comprehensive Performance Measurement Systems on Manager's Performance Through Modification of Mental Models (Learning Process)
One of the ways to reduce agency costs is to plan for the creation of effective decision-making information by designing appropriate comprehensive performance evaluation systems according to managers' learning process One of the important factors in the processing and classification of information for cognitive learning is mental models that are categorized in two dimensions of mental model co...
متن کاملA Context-aware Architecture for Mental Model Sharing through Semantic Movement in Intelligent Agents
Recent studies in multi-agent systems are paying increasingly more attention to the paradigm of designing intelligent agents with human inspired concepts. One of the main cognitive concepts driving the core of many recent approaches in multi agent systems is shared mental models. In this paper, we propose an architecture for sharing mental models based on a new concept called semantic movement....
متن کاملA Context-Based Framework for Mental Representation
In this paper we present a context-based family of formal systems (called MultiContext Systems) which we propose to use as a formal framework for a theory of mental representation. We start with an intuitive notion of context as a subset of the complete (cognitive) state of an individual. Then we introduce two general principles which we believe are at the core of any logic of context, namely t...
متن کاملModeling as Autonomous System : Varela Meets Darwin
This paper posits mental modeling as autopoietic systems of ideas based on processes of selection. A thought experiment is proposed to illustrate the argumentation. After reviewing the essential features of selection theory and mental models, we present modeling as driven by a process of variations and selections. We then show how the deliberate process of model development fosters the generati...
متن کاملDistinguishing minds in interaction: Modeling self-other distinction in the motor system
In order to engage in a continuous social interaction, participants must be able to dynamically understand, predict, and influence each other’s mental states and actions, so as to enable a process of efficient and interactive grounding of shared meaning. We follow the argument that the mentalizing network and the mirror-neuron system in our social brain together provide the basis for these abil...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 1991